US judge blocks Ohio Republicans’ “troublingly vague” social media law

Judge calls law "breathtakingly blunt instrument" for reducing harm to children.

US judge blocks Ohio Republicans’ “troublingly vague” social media law
A boy's hands holding an iPhone showing the icons of various social media apps including YouTube, Facebook, X, TikTok, and Instagram.

Enlarge (credit: Getty Images | Matt Cardy )

A federal judge blocked an Ohio state law that would prevent minors from using social networks without parental consent, calling it a "troublingly vague" law that likely violates the First Amendment. Ohio's "Parental Notification by Social Media Operators Act" affects websites including Facebook, X (formerly Twitter), and YouTube.

"Foreclosing minors under sixteen from accessing all content on websites that the Act purports to cover, absent affirmative parental consent, is a breathtakingly blunt instrument for reducing social media's harm to children," US District Judge Algenon Marbley wrote in an order issued Tuesday. "The approach is an untargeted one, as parents must only give one-time approval for the creation of an account, and parents and platforms are otherwise not required to protect against any of the specific dangers that social media might pose."

While more in-depth arguments will be made later, Marbley called it "unlikely that the government will be able to show that the Act is narrowly tailored to any ends that it identifies." Marbley, a judge in US District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, granted a motion for a temporary restraining order sought by tech-industry lobby group NetChoice. Marbley did not rule on NetChoice's related motion for a preliminary injunction but scheduled a February 7 hearing on the injunction request.

Read 20 remaining paragraphs | Comments

What's Your Reaction?

like

dislike

love

funny

angry

sad

wow